Title: The Sign of the Four
Author: Arthur Conan Doyle
Publisher:
First published: 1890
Pages:
Rating: 6 out of 10
I read the Sherlock Holmes series as a child, so I was very startled to
re-open this book after ten years to the scene of the beloved detective
injecting cocaine into his arm. Obviously, this went right over my head
when I was younger.
The Sign of the Four, which is the second
Sherlock Holmes mystery, has Holmes and Watson investigating a case that
involves a beautiful young woman, Miss Morstan. For years, she has been
receiving pearls in the mail from a mysterious source. She is given the
chance to uncover the benefactor's identity, but within the offer is a
puzzling threat to someone who wronged her. Baffled at who this unknown
individual could possibly mean, she calls upon Sherlock Holmes for help.
But just as they begin to investigate, a man is murdered, and someone
whom Holmes is sure is innocent gets the blame. And so the mystery
unfolds as the two detectives try to recover Miss Morstan's fortune,
find her mysterious pearl-sender, and clear the name of a falsely
accused man.
Perhaps it was because since reading Doyle as a
child I have been introduced to Agatha Christie and other mysteries. Or
perhaps it was just because I was expecting something entirely
different. But for whatever the reason, I didn't love this book like I
thought I would. It was average - and I will keep it, but I don't feel
any motivation to take out any more Sherlock books now.
While
reading, Sherlock Holmes himself struck me as annoying, and I had to
struggle to keep looking for anything likable about him. Watson on the
other hand (who I used to think was very annoying as a child), was
charming and seemed far more realistic of a person than Holmes.
Sherlock
is very precise and detail-obsessed, and having built a revered name
for himself, he also comes across as quite an arrogant, self important
person. He is always convinced that he is right, and seems constantly
impressed with himself. The scene where he puts on a disguise that fools
even Watson, then reveals himself triumphantly, reminded me of a child.
He seemed delighted to have pulled off the disguise so well, and told
everyone so. I half expected him to say "Ta da!" But of course, if you
examine this thinking, you'll just realize that Holmes admittedly
deserves to be a bit inflated. He is a brilliant detective, and I
suppose that his disguise was, grudgingly, pretty good if it even fooled
his longtime companion. But this just annoyed me even further: Holmes
is irritating at times, but he deserves every bit of the praise he gets
(and he knows it).
The author seemed just as enamored with his
character as the rest of the city is. Holmes never makes a mistake, or
if he does, it is quickly retracted and spun into being beneficial.
Holmes always has impressive plans and second-plans and friends and
connections and resources at his fingertips. With this set-up, I can't
see how Holmes could possibly have failed to become a successful
detective.
Watson does not exactly play such an important part in
solving the mystery, but as a reader, I was happy to overlook this. I
was relieved to recall that it is Watson who narrates the stories, not
Holmes.
Watson is more grounded than Holmes, more practical. Holmes
often imagines impossible, exciting solutions to mysteries, while Watson
is more likely to think of what is most logical. Of course, since these
are, after all, impossible, exciting mystery stories, Holmes' guesses
are most often right, but in the real world, it would probably have been
Watson solving all the cases.
Watson also seems far more, well,
human than Holmes. I was very happy for him in finding a love interest
with Miss Morstan. He deserves it.
Besides the revolution of
finding that I actually dislike Sherlock Holmes (that still doesn't
sound right), I also found this book to be (surprise, again) a bit dull
at times. It simply never held my attention.
I am very glad that I
re-read this book, even if it was a bit jarring. Some books you read as
a child seem completely and totally different when you re-read them as
an adult.
No comments:
Post a Comment