Title: Othello
Author: William Shakespeare
Genre: Classics / Plays
First published: 1622
Rating: 7 out of 10
This tragic play by Shakespeare is one that I read as a child, but
didn't quite understand. So last night in Barnes & Noble's, I
decided to re-read it.
This is the story of a Venetian nobleman
named Othello, a Moor from Northern Africa, who made his way from
slavery to wealth and power. His sad story and noble character inspire
Desdemona, a beautiful young woman, to fall in love with him. The two
hastily marry in secret, to the disapproval of many. Othello's personal
attendant, a man named Iago, is meanwhile hunting for a way to bring
about his master's ruin. Iago feels that Othello promoted another man to
a higher position that should have been his, and dwells on a rumor that
Othello slept with his wife. For this, he actively and purposefully
sets out to usher in Othello's destruction. He plants doubts in
Othello's mind about his wife's faithfulness, and goes to great lengths
to set up an entire story of her alleged affair.
Though Othello
believes his wife to be loyal, he eventually allows the smallest doubt
to creep into his mind, which Iago coaxes into certainty with his clever
words and twisting of events.
Eventually, Othello decides that he must kill Desdemona and her supposed lover.
This
play was, indeed, very tragic and sad. I would even go so far as to say
that it is the saddest Shakespeare play I have ever read. For some
reason, the idea of a perfect couple being torn apart by an outsider
seemed even more horrible than the Romeo and Juliet plot line.
I
thought at one point in the story: Poor Othello, poor Desdemona, poor
Cassio! Really, all of the characters played out a very unfortunate
story, and met an equally unfortunate end, all because of one scheming
man.
This man is Iago, who everyone believes to be a loyal,
mostly good individual, even if he does have a negative view on women,
as is witnessed by his wife and Desdemona.
Iago has heard rumors
that Othello slept with his wife, Emilia. He has no proof, and he never
tells us where exactly he heard these rumors. In fact, he seems more
interested in picturing his wife cheating than actually trying to
discover if the rumors are true or not.
With this already in his
mind, he takes the advancement of Cassio as the last straw. Cassio is a
younger, less experienced man, who has just been promoted in the army.
Iago feels that he deserves the job, and that it was wrong of Othello to
forget him.
Though he never voices this like his other complaints,
Iago also seems to have a racist grudge against Othello, who is black.
At the time, serving under a black man would have been unusual and
controversial, and Iago makes a few snide remarks in the beginning that
pertain to Othello's race, mostly in the form of name-calling.
So Iago does not like Othello.
But
he takes it much farther than a simple dislike toward someone. He truly
hates the man, he loathes him, he obsesses day and night over how to
bring about his ruin. This is not done over just a few days, and nor
does Iago simply come up with one plan and go through with it.
Iago's
plans are complex and extremely involved, taking enormous effort.
Because his plans are so complicated and rely heavily on how others
react to them, Iago's plots must adapt constantly, and require much
quick-thinking.
Iago has a way with words. Simple everyday acts like
greeting someone politely, laughing, walking, or making a new friend are
twisted into terrible acts of wickedness by his silver tongue.
Shakespeare uses Iago's character to do what he does best: clever dialogue, which no can do quite like him, still to this day.
An
example of this is the scene in which Iago tells Othello to listen to
him speak to Cassio (who is supposedly cheating with Desdemona,
Othello's wife). Iago asks Cassio about his whore, knowing that Cassio
will assume he is referring to Bianca, who actually is a whore and can
thus be accurately referred to as one. Iago also knows that Othello,
listening, will assume that Iago is referring to Desdemona, who is not a
whore, and thus is being insulted. Cassio speaks lightly of her,
laughing, just as men normally do when speaking of their latest
conquest. However, Othello takes this to mean that Cassio is shameless
and thinks that cheating with his master's wife is a joke.
Scenes
like this are scattered through-out the play, and if the topic at hand
weren't so grave, they would be extremely funny in how witty they are.
Othello
is a Moor (meaning that he is from northern Africa) who is honorable,
respectful, and logical. He does not seem like a jealous man, and at
first is doubtful that Iago can possibly be right about Desdemona's
unfaithfulness. However, I believe that even a trusting man married to
an angel would have eventually grown suspicious with Iago's tricky words
leading him on.
Othello also shows himself, farther on in the story,
to be very passionate, which was actually what made Desdemona attracted
to him in the first place. Yet another sad little fact: The thing that
made her fall in love with her husband is also what ruins their
relationship. Othello becomes utterly enraged by the idea of another man
touching his wife, and the thought consumes him as he does his best to
dismiss it. By the time Iago is done, Othello completely believes the
story he has been told, and is driven even to murder.
Cassio, yet
another of Iago's victims, is another character whose life is ruined
simply by Iago's word choice. One day, he is a handsome, charismatic
young ladies man who has just been promoted to a prestigious new title.
But the next day, he has been falsely labeled a drunkard and a brawler,
is thought to be an adulterer, and has two men scheming out how to
murder him.
Iago's third victim would be Desdemona, a pretty
young rich girl who fell in love with Othello despite the public opinion
that they were an ill match. She risks and endures her father's
disownment of her just to be with Othello, only to have her romance torn
apart by Iago's lies. The injustice of it all is a sense that is
strongly felt through-out the play, particularly in the scenes involving
Desdemona, due to her innocence.
Desdemona is completely unaware of
the schemes being plotted against her, and the suspicions that her
husband is needlessly drawing up about her.
She struck me as naive, angelic, and very sweet. This cherubic character only served to make the audience pity her even more.
At the end, when Othello voices his thoughts about her cheating, she remains devoted to him, a touching and heartbreaking scene.
I think that every single character in this play suffers in some way (mostly in a very large way) due to Iago.
Jealousy
is a prominent theme here. Iago is jealous of almost everyone, seeing
himself as deserving of whatever pleasures they may have. He uses other
men's admiration of Desdemona's beauty to prod them into jealousy over
Othello (who is certainly sleeping with her, since he is her husband) or
of Cassio (who is allegedly sleeping with her just because Iago says
so). Understanding jealousy inside and out and being an apparent expert
on the subject, Iago skillfully weaves other men's jealousy into yet
another way of getting what he wants.
Though the entire play is about jealousy and cheating, it appears that none of the characters actually ever cheat.
The
first woman who is accused of cheating by Iago is his wife, Emilia, but
this is presumably not true. No evidence to it being true is ever even
hinted at.
The next is, of course, Desdemona, who is unquestionably innocent.
This is a sad play that sets off Shakespeare's style and abilities perfectly. I would recommend it highly.
Showing posts with label Plays. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Plays. Show all posts
Friday, May 17, 2013
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
Review: Look Back in Anger by John Osborne
Title: Look Back in Anger
Author: John Osborne
Genre: Plays / Literature
Publisher: Penguin
First performed: May 8, 1956
First published: 1957
Rating: 7 out of 10
Today is this thought-provoking play's 57th anniversary, and even though I read it years ago, it is one that I vividly remember as if I just finished the last page yesterday.
Look Back in Anger is a play centrally focused on Jimmy Porter, a spiteful, hateful man who seems intent on destroying everything that he loves. He lives with his wife, Alison, and his best friend, Cliff. Alison and Jimmy's relationship is one of hurt and abuse, as Jimmy does everything he can, night after night, to provoke Alison into rage. Cliff, the tired mediator, generally stands by and watches, making feeble attempts to calm everyone down whenever things get especially chaotic.
This is the routine that the three miserably go through, until a guest interrupts things. Helena, an old friend of Alison, comes to stay.
She is horrified at Jimmy's vindictive treatment of his wife, and rises to his every insult, defending her and dealing out quite a few insults of her own. Through an outsider's eyes, Alison realizes just how much of a let down her married life has become, and decides to go away for a few days.
In the first night of her absence, Jimmy and Helena, whose violent arguments have awoken a sexual desire in both of them, fall into each others arms.
This play never changed scenes, and there were a total of only five characters in the entire thing (one of which is only featured in a few pages).
However, it is not a simple story. The characters are without a doubt the strength of it, because they are complex and well drawn. Jimmy is the prominent one, which is probable because he is characterized by mad outbursts, angry speeches, and bewildering mood swings. He reminded me of Stanley in "A Streetcar Named Desire," which this play very closely resembles.
Alison was also quite well done - the sad, timid, and abused little wife who forces herself to believe that she still loves her husband.
Cliff seemed to be quite a dull man, but I couldn't help but wonder what he hid behind his blase personality.
Helena was also complex. She vehemently fights against Jimmy, for the sake of Alison's honor, it seems. She advises Alison against staying with Jimmy, and seems to be the strong voice of reason. However, as soon as her friend is out the door, she is in bed with Alison's husband. Did Helena just advise Alison to leave because she wanted Jimmy for herself?
The character study made the story, but beyond that, I would find it hard to think of something that actually happened, beyond ironing boards falling onto people.
Great characters.
Author: John Osborne
Genre: Plays / Literature
Publisher: Penguin
First performed: May 8, 1956
First published: 1957
Rating: 7 out of 10
Today is this thought-provoking play's 57th anniversary, and even though I read it years ago, it is one that I vividly remember as if I just finished the last page yesterday.
Look Back in Anger is a play centrally focused on Jimmy Porter, a spiteful, hateful man who seems intent on destroying everything that he loves. He lives with his wife, Alison, and his best friend, Cliff. Alison and Jimmy's relationship is one of hurt and abuse, as Jimmy does everything he can, night after night, to provoke Alison into rage. Cliff, the tired mediator, generally stands by and watches, making feeble attempts to calm everyone down whenever things get especially chaotic.
This is the routine that the three miserably go through, until a guest interrupts things. Helena, an old friend of Alison, comes to stay.
She is horrified at Jimmy's vindictive treatment of his wife, and rises to his every insult, defending her and dealing out quite a few insults of her own. Through an outsider's eyes, Alison realizes just how much of a let down her married life has become, and decides to go away for a few days.
In the first night of her absence, Jimmy and Helena, whose violent arguments have awoken a sexual desire in both of them, fall into each others arms.
This play never changed scenes, and there were a total of only five characters in the entire thing (one of which is only featured in a few pages).
However, it is not a simple story. The characters are without a doubt the strength of it, because they are complex and well drawn. Jimmy is the prominent one, which is probable because he is characterized by mad outbursts, angry speeches, and bewildering mood swings. He reminded me of Stanley in "A Streetcar Named Desire," which this play very closely resembles.
Alison was also quite well done - the sad, timid, and abused little wife who forces herself to believe that she still loves her husband.
Cliff seemed to be quite a dull man, but I couldn't help but wonder what he hid behind his blase personality.
Helena was also complex. She vehemently fights against Jimmy, for the sake of Alison's honor, it seems. She advises Alison against staying with Jimmy, and seems to be the strong voice of reason. However, as soon as her friend is out the door, she is in bed with Alison's husband. Did Helena just advise Alison to leave because she wanted Jimmy for herself?
The character study made the story, but beyond that, I would find it hard to think of something that actually happened, beyond ironing boards falling onto people.
Great characters.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Review: Antony and Cleopatra by William Shakespeare
Title: Antony and Cleopatra
Author: William Shakespeare
Genre: Classics / Plays
First published: 1623
Rating: 7 out of 10
This Shakespeare play tells the famous love story of Marcus Antonius and Cleopatra VII. Their countries, the crumbling kingdom of Egypt and the rising, powerful kingdom of Rome, are at war, and relations are hostile. Despite all this, Antony and Cleopatra, who should have been enemies, are in love. Caesar is beginning to take desperate measures in order to lure Antony back to his homeland, where they need him as a general.
This play contained a lot of interesting motives, with the love story between enemies as the most noticeable, of course. Caesar's many efforts to direct Antony's love back to Rome were also interesting - after the man had slighted him, insulted him, and defied him so many times, Caesar remains hopeful, and continues his attempts to reclaim his best general. Besides being in need of a strong commander for his war, Caesar obviously also loves Antony as a son or brother.
Cleopatra was also interesting, and one of those characters who you can't quite predict (besides knowing the story beforehand, that is). She is at times hard and cool, at other times warm. Cruel and kind, angry and happy. With Antony, her mind and moods change like the wind. I wondered, exasperated at times, how he could possibly put up with her. However, Antony seems to view this as evidence of how passionate Cleopatra is, how unique, and how mysterious she is. Antony is fascinated with her, and would have been no matter what.
Like many hopeless romances that cannot possibly end well, this one doesn't. The scene where Antony flees from battle to follow Cleopatra was a sad one. On one hand, his ultimate, absolute devotion to her was touching. Being a soldier and a warrior was what he had been trained to do for all his life. Undoubtedly, he dreamed of one day being a general. He knows nothing else, and he has worked for nothing else. He will have had men in his charge on other ships, probably friends, perhaps men he grew up with. Yet he leaves them, to follow Cleopatra's ship. It was a terrible choice that had tragic consequences, one that was neither right nor wrong.
Though he does not regret his love for Cleopatra, Antony acknowledges after his desertion from battle that he betrayed his men and himself.
A tragic Shakespearean romance.
Author: William Shakespeare
Genre: Classics / Plays
First published: 1623
Rating: 7 out of 10
This Shakespeare play tells the famous love story of Marcus Antonius and Cleopatra VII. Their countries, the crumbling kingdom of Egypt and the rising, powerful kingdom of Rome, are at war, and relations are hostile. Despite all this, Antony and Cleopatra, who should have been enemies, are in love. Caesar is beginning to take desperate measures in order to lure Antony back to his homeland, where they need him as a general.
This play contained a lot of interesting motives, with the love story between enemies as the most noticeable, of course. Caesar's many efforts to direct Antony's love back to Rome were also interesting - after the man had slighted him, insulted him, and defied him so many times, Caesar remains hopeful, and continues his attempts to reclaim his best general. Besides being in need of a strong commander for his war, Caesar obviously also loves Antony as a son or brother.
Cleopatra was also interesting, and one of those characters who you can't quite predict (besides knowing the story beforehand, that is). She is at times hard and cool, at other times warm. Cruel and kind, angry and happy. With Antony, her mind and moods change like the wind. I wondered, exasperated at times, how he could possibly put up with her. However, Antony seems to view this as evidence of how passionate Cleopatra is, how unique, and how mysterious she is. Antony is fascinated with her, and would have been no matter what.
Like many hopeless romances that cannot possibly end well, this one doesn't. The scene where Antony flees from battle to follow Cleopatra was a sad one. On one hand, his ultimate, absolute devotion to her was touching. Being a soldier and a warrior was what he had been trained to do for all his life. Undoubtedly, he dreamed of one day being a general. He knows nothing else, and he has worked for nothing else. He will have had men in his charge on other ships, probably friends, perhaps men he grew up with. Yet he leaves them, to follow Cleopatra's ship. It was a terrible choice that had tragic consequences, one that was neither right nor wrong.
Though he does not regret his love for Cleopatra, Antony acknowledges after his desertion from battle that he betrayed his men and himself.
A tragic Shakespearean romance.
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Review: The Emperor Jones by Eugene O'Neill
Title: The Emperor Jones
Author: Eugene O'Neill
Genre: Plays
Publisher: Dover Thrift
First published: 1921
Rating: 5 out of 10
The Emperor Jones was the second of two plays I read by Eugene O'Neill, both published in 1921.
This play opens with the last of the many servants and subjects of a self-made "emperor" sneaking out from the palace and into the jungle. The setting is an unknown island in the West Indies, where Brutus Jones, a black convict who fled the United States, has set himself up as an emperor with absolute power and luxury.
A man named Henry Smithers appears to be 2nd in command, a sort of false friend to the emperor, and he is the first to learn that all of the slaves have slipped away into the woods. We learn that Smithers is the only white man on the island, and while he sneeringly sees this as an advantage, the emperor and everyone else see him as an outsider and a minority.
When the slaves begin a war dance and begin marching toward the palace, the emperor decides to do what is hinted as his specialty - run. And so, he runs through the dark jungle at night, though where he is going is unclear. After all, this is an island.
He is eventually caught, and forced to face all of his worst fears - many of which seem to be about himself.
Author: Eugene O'Neill
Genre: Plays
Publisher: Dover Thrift
First published: 1921
Rating: 5 out of 10
The Emperor Jones was the second of two plays I read by Eugene O'Neill, both published in 1921.
This play opens with the last of the many servants and subjects of a self-made "emperor" sneaking out from the palace and into the jungle. The setting is an unknown island in the West Indies, where Brutus Jones, a black convict who fled the United States, has set himself up as an emperor with absolute power and luxury.
A man named Henry Smithers appears to be 2nd in command, a sort of false friend to the emperor, and he is the first to learn that all of the slaves have slipped away into the woods. We learn that Smithers is the only white man on the island, and while he sneeringly sees this as an advantage, the emperor and everyone else see him as an outsider and a minority.
When the slaves begin a war dance and begin marching toward the palace, the emperor decides to do what is hinted as his specialty - run. And so, he runs through the dark jungle at night, though where he is going is unclear. After all, this is an island.
He is eventually caught, and forced to face all of his worst fears - many of which seem to be about himself.
Review: Anna Christie by Eugene O'Neill
Title: Anna Christie
Author: Eugene O'Neill
Genre: Plays
First published: 1921
Rating: 6 out of 10
This American play, written in 1921, was one of two little Eugene O'Neill volumes that I decided to read back to back.
The first scene opens with Chris Christopherson, more commonly known as "Old Chris," relaxing at a pub, and telling fellow drinkers and friends about his daughter, Anna Christie, who is coming to visit him. Chris hasn't seen his daughter since she was two years old, which was 15 years ago. Chris' ex-wife was driven mad by her husband's occupation as a sailor, and came to hate the sea and any men having anything to do with it. And so, long ago, she took their child and moved to a safely landlocked state. Now, Anna is coming to visit her father for the first time, and he isn't at all sure what to expect or how to act.
Anna arrives in town just a few pages later, strolling into the same local pub that her father has just exited. Her father, knowing that Anna's mother will have brought her up to loathe the sea, has lied to her and told her that he is a janitor, but it doesn't take very long for Anna to discover that in reality, her father is captain of a coal barge. The scene ends with her being horrified, and vowing that she will never stay with her father if it means living on the water.
When the next scene opens, apparently some time has passed, and Anna seems to be taking to sea life very well. She is enamored by the sea, and loves to simply stand on the deck for hours taking in the water, the fog, and the salty air. Chris, rather than being pleased, does all he can to rid his daughter of this enchantment, doing his best to portray the ocean and sailors in the worst light possible.
Shortly after, a marooned sailor is rescued from the water and brought aboard the ship. The man, whose name is Burke, takes an immediate fancy to Anna, but it isn't until she sends him sprawling over the deck with a good punch (for flirting) that he falls in love.
Anna, though she has similar feelings, is plagued by her knowledge that nothing can ever work out between she and Burke, due to her past as a prostitute.
This play had an interesting enough storyline to keep me reading, and I finished it quickly in one sitting. The characters are all simple, realistic people that you can easily imagine as people - whether on a stage or in real life. And because the play is relatively short, O'Neill doesn't waste any time moving from one scene to another.
I found the underlying character of the sea interesting: Chris, a man of the sea himself, apparently agrees with his ex-wife's sentiments about its evil. Though he has held some respectable ranks as captain and bosun on other vessels before, he is ashamed rather than proud of these accomplishments, and is agonized when he hears his daughter boasting about them. Rather than be happy that Anna discovers a love for the sea, he is horrified. He tells her dark tales of people being drowned, terrible storms, and portrays all sailors as duplicitous, unscrupulous scoundrels. Most of all, he warns her against marrying a sailor, who he says will only leave her for his first love - the sea.
The sea is portrayed as an addictive mistress that is both loved and hated.
Of course, in the end, Anna does end up with a sailor. He promises that he will never leave her for very long, that he will take her with him on voyages when he can, and that he will never even look at any of the other women in seaside ports. But we have to wonder if this is true, or if Chris is right.
Of the two plays by O'Neill that I read (the other being The Emperor Jones), I liked this one best.
Author: Eugene O'Neill
Genre: Plays
First published: 1921
Rating: 6 out of 10
This American play, written in 1921, was one of two little Eugene O'Neill volumes that I decided to read back to back.
The first scene opens with Chris Christopherson, more commonly known as "Old Chris," relaxing at a pub, and telling fellow drinkers and friends about his daughter, Anna Christie, who is coming to visit him. Chris hasn't seen his daughter since she was two years old, which was 15 years ago. Chris' ex-wife was driven mad by her husband's occupation as a sailor, and came to hate the sea and any men having anything to do with it. And so, long ago, she took their child and moved to a safely landlocked state. Now, Anna is coming to visit her father for the first time, and he isn't at all sure what to expect or how to act.
Anna arrives in town just a few pages later, strolling into the same local pub that her father has just exited. Her father, knowing that Anna's mother will have brought her up to loathe the sea, has lied to her and told her that he is a janitor, but it doesn't take very long for Anna to discover that in reality, her father is captain of a coal barge. The scene ends with her being horrified, and vowing that she will never stay with her father if it means living on the water.
When the next scene opens, apparently some time has passed, and Anna seems to be taking to sea life very well. She is enamored by the sea, and loves to simply stand on the deck for hours taking in the water, the fog, and the salty air. Chris, rather than being pleased, does all he can to rid his daughter of this enchantment, doing his best to portray the ocean and sailors in the worst light possible.
Shortly after, a marooned sailor is rescued from the water and brought aboard the ship. The man, whose name is Burke, takes an immediate fancy to Anna, but it isn't until she sends him sprawling over the deck with a good punch (for flirting) that he falls in love.
Anna, though she has similar feelings, is plagued by her knowledge that nothing can ever work out between she and Burke, due to her past as a prostitute.
This play had an interesting enough storyline to keep me reading, and I finished it quickly in one sitting. The characters are all simple, realistic people that you can easily imagine as people - whether on a stage or in real life. And because the play is relatively short, O'Neill doesn't waste any time moving from one scene to another.
I found the underlying character of the sea interesting: Chris, a man of the sea himself, apparently agrees with his ex-wife's sentiments about its evil. Though he has held some respectable ranks as captain and bosun on other vessels before, he is ashamed rather than proud of these accomplishments, and is agonized when he hears his daughter boasting about them. Rather than be happy that Anna discovers a love for the sea, he is horrified. He tells her dark tales of people being drowned, terrible storms, and portrays all sailors as duplicitous, unscrupulous scoundrels. Most of all, he warns her against marrying a sailor, who he says will only leave her for his first love - the sea.
The sea is portrayed as an addictive mistress that is both loved and hated.
Of course, in the end, Anna does end up with a sailor. He promises that he will never leave her for very long, that he will take her with him on voyages when he can, and that he will never even look at any of the other women in seaside ports. But we have to wonder if this is true, or if Chris is right.
Of the two plays by O'Neill that I read (the other being The Emperor Jones), I liked this one best.
Review: The Assembly of Women by Aristophanes
Title: The Assembly of Women
Author: Aristophanes
Genre: Classics / Classical Literature / Plays
Origin: 391 B.C.
Rating: 7 out of 10
The Assembly of Women, or, Ἐκκλησιάζουσαι, reminded me very strongly of my favorite Aristophanes, Lysistrata. If you loved that play as much as I did, you will enjoy this one as well.
The first scene starts off with a group of wives in Ancient Athens stealing their husband's clothes and setting off to speak at the male-only Assembly. Their novel ideas, which concern land ownership, equality, and even sex, are met with a mixture of both outraged indignation and curious popularity.
This play was very fun, and I loved the spirited, mischievously intelligent women. I cannot leave out their exaggeratedly slow witted husbands, who were hilarious.
Aristophanes is perhaps the world's first champion of women's rights, and he puts his ideas into comedy very well.
Author: Aristophanes
Genre: Classics / Classical Literature / Plays
Origin: 391 B.C.
Rating: 7 out of 10
The Assembly of Women, or, Ἐκκλησιάζουσαι, reminded me very strongly of my favorite Aristophanes, Lysistrata. If you loved that play as much as I did, you will enjoy this one as well.
The first scene starts off with a group of wives in Ancient Athens stealing their husband's clothes and setting off to speak at the male-only Assembly. Their novel ideas, which concern land ownership, equality, and even sex, are met with a mixture of both outraged indignation and curious popularity.
This play was very fun, and I loved the spirited, mischievously intelligent women. I cannot leave out their exaggeratedly slow witted husbands, who were hilarious.
Aristophanes is perhaps the world's first champion of women's rights, and he puts his ideas into comedy very well.
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Review: Troilus and Cressida
Title: Troilus and Cressida
Author: William Shakespeare
Genre: Plays / Classics
Written: 1602 (probable)
Rating - 4 out of 10
More than any other author, I never like finding fault with Shakespeare, even though with some imperfect plays of his, it isn't all that difficult. Well, this was one of those plays. It's Shakespeare, yes, but a flawed one.
Troilus and Cressida is about a young man, Troilus, and his lover, Cressida. Set during the Trojan War, among other characters are the recognizable Achilles, Hector, Helen and Paris.
The main character's love story never seems very convincing. Troilus is constantly praising his beloved highly, while another character does his best to convince him of her low morals. And strangely, Troilus and Cressida are rarely in the same room or the same scene together. Most of their supposed "romance" is via them talking or thinking about each other separately.
The character of Cressida is not very built up at all. It takes a few scenes for her to enter the story, and once she does, virtually nothing about her is revealed. One catches fleeting glimpses of a feisty nature, but other than this, all we seem to really know of Cressida is that she is beautiful (and only because this is proclaimed by Troilus over and over). Shakespeare even goes so far as to say that her beauty rivals that of Helen's. I kept waiting for her to come more into focus, yet she never came out of the background. As a result, we have a lone character telling us that he is in love and in the middle of an epic romance, without any evidence of this, not even Cressida herself.
Another thing that I disliked about this play was how much dialogue there was. Yes, I know that plays are all dialogue, but what I mean is, no one ever did anything. All that the characters ever did was talk - and never about anything relevant.
These endless talks are not involved with the book's plot in any major way, save that the Trojan War is its setting, of course. They also seem to lead nowhere, and are simply dry and dull. Characters discuss battle tactics and war strategies, but nothing ever comes of them, making me wonder why they would be included in the first place.
I had never before seen Shakespeare write such dreadfully tedious scenes.
And besides the endless talking, I disliked the ending, in which Cressida is caught being unfaithful by Troilus. After that, she simply disappears altogether! She is not brought back into the story again for the entire book, besides when a letter arrives from her, which still offers little closure.
All in all, I disliked this one. Not recommended unless you want to read through Shakespeare's work in its entirety.
Author: William Shakespeare
Genre: Plays / Classics
Written: 1602 (probable)
Rating - 4 out of 10
More than any other author, I never like finding fault with Shakespeare, even though with some imperfect plays of his, it isn't all that difficult. Well, this was one of those plays. It's Shakespeare, yes, but a flawed one.
Troilus and Cressida is about a young man, Troilus, and his lover, Cressida. Set during the Trojan War, among other characters are the recognizable Achilles, Hector, Helen and Paris.
The main character's love story never seems very convincing. Troilus is constantly praising his beloved highly, while another character does his best to convince him of her low morals. And strangely, Troilus and Cressida are rarely in the same room or the same scene together. Most of their supposed "romance" is via them talking or thinking about each other separately.
The character of Cressida is not very built up at all. It takes a few scenes for her to enter the story, and once she does, virtually nothing about her is revealed. One catches fleeting glimpses of a feisty nature, but other than this, all we seem to really know of Cressida is that she is beautiful (and only because this is proclaimed by Troilus over and over). Shakespeare even goes so far as to say that her beauty rivals that of Helen's. I kept waiting for her to come more into focus, yet she never came out of the background. As a result, we have a lone character telling us that he is in love and in the middle of an epic romance, without any evidence of this, not even Cressida herself.
Another thing that I disliked about this play was how much dialogue there was. Yes, I know that plays are all dialogue, but what I mean is, no one ever did anything. All that the characters ever did was talk - and never about anything relevant.
These endless talks are not involved with the book's plot in any major way, save that the Trojan War is its setting, of course. They also seem to lead nowhere, and are simply dry and dull. Characters discuss battle tactics and war strategies, but nothing ever comes of them, making me wonder why they would be included in the first place.
I had never before seen Shakespeare write such dreadfully tedious scenes.
And besides the endless talking, I disliked the ending, in which Cressida is caught being unfaithful by Troilus. After that, she simply disappears altogether! She is not brought back into the story again for the entire book, besides when a letter arrives from her, which still offers little closure.
All in all, I disliked this one. Not recommended unless you want to read through Shakespeare's work in its entirety.
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Review: A Flea in Her Ear by Georges Feydeau
Title: A Flea in Her Ear
Author: Georges Feydeau
Genre: Plays / Comedy
Publisher: Samuel French, Inc.
Published: 1907 (as La Puce à l'oreille)
Pages: 160
Rating - 9 out of 10
This little play really surprised me! My edition gave me no clue as to its content, though I was able to distantly recall the name Feydeau as being related to the Bell Epoque era.
This farce proved impossible to put down once I started it, and I devoured it in one sitting.
The characters are distinctive and memorable - my favorites being a man with a speech impediment, a crazed jealous Spaniard, and an arrogant, flirtatious husband.
Witty dialogue, fast paced scenes of confusion and uproar, and a plot full of trickery, impersonations, mistaken identity, and investigations make this play unforgettable.
In "A Flea in Her Ear," a wife suspects her husband of being unfaithful, so she writes him a seductive love letter from an invented 'other woman,' to test his reaction. From there, all sorts of mistaken meanings, identities and intentions make for a wild adventure.
Typically French, this book is endlessly clever and full of sharp humor, as well as plenty of suggestive laughs that often do more than just suggest.
A favorite! I will certainly be reading more of Georges Feydeau.
Author: Georges Feydeau
Genre: Plays / Comedy
Publisher: Samuel French, Inc.
Published: 1907 (as La Puce à l'oreille)
Pages: 160
Rating - 9 out of 10
This little play really surprised me! My edition gave me no clue as to its content, though I was able to distantly recall the name Feydeau as being related to the Bell Epoque era.
This farce proved impossible to put down once I started it, and I devoured it in one sitting.
The characters are distinctive and memorable - my favorites being a man with a speech impediment, a crazed jealous Spaniard, and an arrogant, flirtatious husband.
Witty dialogue, fast paced scenes of confusion and uproar, and a plot full of trickery, impersonations, mistaken identity, and investigations make this play unforgettable.
In "A Flea in Her Ear," a wife suspects her husband of being unfaithful, so she writes him a seductive love letter from an invented 'other woman,' to test his reaction. From there, all sorts of mistaken meanings, identities and intentions make for a wild adventure.
Typically French, this book is endlessly clever and full of sharp humor, as well as plenty of suggestive laughs that often do more than just suggest.
A favorite! I will certainly be reading more of Georges Feydeau.
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Review: The Effect of Gamma Rays on Man-in-the-Moon Marigolds by Paul Zindel
Title: The Effect of Gamma Rays on Man-in-the-Moon Marigolds
Author: Paul Zindel
Genre: Plays
Publisher: Harper Collins
Published: 1964
Pages: 112
Rating - 9 out of 10
This heart wrenching story is probably my favorite play of all time.
Written from the innocent, simplistically factual view of a bright young middle-schooler, Tillie, we are introduced to a tense family scene where love and hate often blur in indistinguishable lines.
Tilly is a quiet girl with dreams of one day making important scientific discoveries. For now, she is hard at work on a project for her school's science fair, experimenting with marigolds whose seeds have been exposed to radioactivity. The two supporting characters, her sister Ruth and her embittered mother Beatrice, are some of the strongest characters I have ever read.
This book is short, concise, and easy to get through, writing at the approximate level of a middle schooler. However, the story-line remains entirely adult, mature, and haunting. Regardless of its number of pages, this is one of the most powerful books I have ever read.
Paul Zindel has brilliantly combined childhood with mature and sobering conflicts - this book is depressing and a bit disturbing, unabashedly honest, and extraordinarily written.
Highly recommended - a must read.
Author: Paul Zindel
Genre: Plays
Publisher: Harper Collins
Published: 1964
Pages: 112
Rating - 9 out of 10
This heart wrenching story is probably my favorite play of all time.
Written from the innocent, simplistically factual view of a bright young middle-schooler, Tillie, we are introduced to a tense family scene where love and hate often blur in indistinguishable lines.
Tilly is a quiet girl with dreams of one day making important scientific discoveries. For now, she is hard at work on a project for her school's science fair, experimenting with marigolds whose seeds have been exposed to radioactivity. The two supporting characters, her sister Ruth and her embittered mother Beatrice, are some of the strongest characters I have ever read.
This book is short, concise, and easy to get through, writing at the approximate level of a middle schooler. However, the story-line remains entirely adult, mature, and haunting. Regardless of its number of pages, this is one of the most powerful books I have ever read.
Paul Zindel has brilliantly combined childhood with mature and sobering conflicts - this book is depressing and a bit disturbing, unabashedly honest, and extraordinarily written.
Highly recommended - a must read.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








